0 Trackback and Pingbacks: »

5 People Said A Couple Of Things: »

• totoro wrote from on September 23, 2005 at 13:21 and said:

  Depends on what kind of recognition. Fame is simply to be well known. To be recognized, does not depend on numbers. If I recognize you to be a good man (not that ‘good man’), is that not enough?

  Comment Permalink

• minishorts wrote from on September 23, 2005 at 13:35 and said:

  as far as recognition would take me.

  Comment Permalink

• Jeremy C wrote from on September 23, 2005 at 14:45 and said:

  IMHO, recognition and fame often go hand in hand. The difference is that recognition is a positive means of attaining fame, whether you want to or not.

  Since it’s a positive thing and should not undermine one’s principles or moral/ethical judgment, then I can only agree with minishorts…

  Comment Permalink

• Kamigoroshi wrote from on September 23, 2005 at 16:40 and said:

  Fair enough I guess…that would mean that it wouldn’t be wrong to try and stretch the recognition for a good deed as far as you can possibly stretch would it? I guess the real question would be, how thin is the line between earning recognition and seeking fame?

  Comment Permalink

• lishun wrote from on September 23, 2005 at 18:43 and said:

  depends how much recognition you want. if you’re happy with a thank you, a mention in the credits page, an acknowledgement link or a teh tarik kurang manis at a mamak stall…that’s as far as you need to go.

  i wouldn’t stretch the recognition at all. i’m happy enough if people even realise that i had the choice to not help them, but i did. not many people do.

  did i go out of point?

  Comment Permalink